MEDICAL TUESDAY . NET |
NEWSLETTER |
Community For Better Health Care |
Vol IX, No 18,
Dec 28, 2010 |
In This Issue:
1.
Featured Article:
A Hundred Billion Neurons – a
Cosmic Headache
2.
In
the News: Placebos really work
3.
International Medicine: It's
time government called "time out" on the Canada Health Act
4.
Medicare: When
the Doctor Has a Boss
5.
Medical Gluttony:
Best Practices or Pay for
Performance is really Gluttony in Disguise
6.
Medical Myths: Slow Metabolism makes me gain
weight
7.
Overheard in the Medical Staff Lounge: When the Doctor Has a Boss
8.
Voices of Medicine: A Homeless Man's
Funeral . . .
9.
The Bookshelf: The
Power To Control, A Review By JEREMY PHILIPS
10.
Hippocrates
& His Kin: The Highest Pay Increases in
Sacramento went to Hospital CEOs.
11.
Related Organizations: Restoring Accountability in Medical Practice and Society
Words of Wisdom,
Recent Postings, In Memoriam . . .
* * * * *
Merry Christmas 2010
Thursday night, December 24, 1776, marks
the anniversary of George Washington leading his troops across the Delaware to
attack the British the next day in New Jersey. Thus began the greatest
experiment in human freedom the world has ever experienced. The history of
governments for millennia has been one of oppression and servitude. Freedom of
this magnitude was never previously sought nor enjoyed by a nation. This
freedom lasted for 150 years. It has been gradually restricting for the past 75
years. We must be forever on guard that our government does not repeat history.
Government has found a new access to our most personal and private lives - our
medical records. This last invasion now makes control over our very lives
absolute. Let's make our final stand in our battle of Appomattox, which on April 9, 1865, preserved our nation in the Civil War. To
that end, MedicalTuesday is dedicated to restoring freedom in health care - the
only assurance of privacy in our personal health matters and in our lives.
After this battle is won, we will continue the battle for the Freedom we won in
1776, began losing in 1933, nearly completed in 2010, to eliminate the
intrusion of government into our personal and private lives.
* * * * *
1. Featured Article: A Hundred Billion Neurons – 100
Trillion Connections - a Cosmic Headache
The noise of billions of brain cells
trying to communicate with one another may hold a crucial clue to understanding
consciousness
100 Trillion Connections; January
2011; Scientific American Magazine; by Carl Zimmer; 6 Pages
In Brief
A
single neuron cannot
do much, but string a few hundred together and a primitive nervous system
emerges, one sophisticated enough to keep a worm going.
More neurons equate to a more complex organism. A central preoccupation of
neuroscience is deducing the way billions of neurons produce the human mind.
Neuroscientists have
begun to unravel the brain's
complexity by adopting research on other elaborate systems, ranging from
computer chips to the stock market.
Understanding the
workings of the brain's intricate
networks may provide clues to the underlying origins of devastating disorders,
including schizophrenia and dementia.
A single neuron sits in a petri dish, crackling in
lonely contentment. From time to time, it spontaneously unleashes a wave of
electric current that travels down its length. If you deliver pulses of
electricity to one end of the cell, the neuron may respond with extra spikes of
voltage. Bathe the neuron in various neurotransmitters, and you can alter the
strength and timing of its electrical waves. On its own, in its dish, the
neuron can't do much. But join together 302 neurons, and they become a nervous
system that can keep the worm Caenorhabditis elegans alive—sensing the
animal's surroundings, making decisions and issuing commands to the worm's body.
Join together 100 billion neurons—with 100 trillion connections—and you have
yourself a human brain, capable of much, much more.
How our minds emerge from our flock of neurons remains
deeply mysterious. It's the kind of question that neuroscience, for all its
triumphs, has been ill equipped to answer. Some neuroscientists dedicate their
careers to the workings of individual neurons. Others choose a higher scale:
they might, for example, look at how the hippocampus, a cluster of millions of
neurons, encodes memories. Others might look at the brain at an even higher
scale, observing all the regions that become active when we perform a
particular task, such as reading or feeling fear. But few have tried to
contemplate the brain on its many scales at once. Their reticence stems, in
part, from the sheer scope of the challenge. The interactions between just a
few neurons can be a confusing thicket of feedbacks. Add 100 billion more
neurons to the problem, and the endeavor turns into a cosmic headache.
Yet some neuroscientists
think it is time to tackle the challenge. They argue that we will never truly
understand how the mind emerges from our nervous system if we break the brain
down into disconnected pieces. Looking only at the parts would be like trying
to figure out how water freezes by studying a single water molecule.
"Ice" is a meaningless term on the scale of individual molecules. It
emerges only from the interaction of a vast number of molecules, as they
collectively lock into crystals.
Fortunately, neuroscientists
can draw inspiration from other researchers who have been studying complexity
in its many forms for decades—from stock markets to computer circuits to
interacting genes and proteins in a single cell. A cell and a stock market may
not seem to have much in common, but researchers have found some underlying
similarities in every complex system they have studied. They have also
developed mathematical tools that can be used to analyze those systems.
Neuroscientists are picking up those tools and starting to use them to make
sense of the brain's complexity. It's still early days, but their results so
far are promising. Scientists are discovering the rules by which billions of
neurons are organized into networks, which, in turn, function together as a
single, coherent network we call the brain. The organization of this network,
scientists are finding, is crucial to our ability to make sense of an ever
changing world. And some of the most devastating mental disorders, such as
schizophrenia and dementia, may be partly the result of the collapse of the
brain's networks. . .
Read
the entire article in Scientific American – Subscription required . . .
Feedback . . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday . . .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA . . .
* * * * *
2. In the News: Placebos really work
Patients report improvement even when they know
medicine is fake
AMINA KHAN, Los Angeles Times, Wednesday, Dec. 22,
LOS
ANGELES -- A
simple sugar pill may help treat a disease - even if patients know they're
getting fake medicine. . .
"The conventional wisdom is you need
to make a patient think they're taking a drug, you have to use deception and
lies," said lead author Ted
Kaptchuk, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.
And, Kaptchuk added, it seems many doctors do this: In one report, as many as
half of rheumatologists and internists surveyed said they had intentionally
given patients ineffective medication in the hopes it would have a positive
result.
Kaptchuk, however, wondered whether the
deception was needed. When he first tried to persuade fellow researchers to
explore a sort of "honest" placebo, "they said it was
nuts," he said. After all, didn't the whole effect hinge on people
believing they were getting real treatment?
Patients were easier to enlist.
"People said, 'Wow, that's weird' and we said, 'Yeah, we think it might
work.' "
The researchers enrolled 80 people
suffering from irritable bowel syndrome, explaining the experiment while
framing it positively - they called it a novel "mind-body" therapy.
Half the patients were given a bottle with
the word "placebo" printed on it. The pills it held, they were told,
were like sugar pills. The patients were told they didn't even need to believe
in the placebo effect, but had to take the pills twice daily.
The other half were given no treatment at
all.
At the end of the three-week trial, 59
percent of the patients taking the placebo said their symptoms had been
adequately relieved, far outstripping the 35 percent in the non-treatment
group. . .
The results, which Kaptchuk said need to
be replicated in a longer, larger study, show that placebo pills could be
useful for chronic pain, depression and anxiety, among others, without the need
for deception.
"My personal hypothesis is this would
not happen without a positive doctor-patient relationship," Kaptchuk said.
Others agreed. "What seems to be the
active ingredient is the warm, personal relationship," said Dr. Howard Brody of the University
of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston,
Texas.
Tor Wager, a cognitive neuroscientist at
the University of
Colorado at Boulder, said
this and future research may help change the way doctors treat their patients.
"In terms of medical research,
there's been a big gap between what people feel is true in the clinic and what
is scientifically investigated," he said. "This study takes a step
toward filling that gap. It shows the human context essentially does
matter."
Read
the entire article . . .
Feedback . . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
* * * * *
3. International Medicine: Why it's time government
called "time out" on the Canada Health Act
Mark
Rovere National Post,
November 29, 2010
When
it comes to Canadian health care, everyone seems to agree our system has
problems and needs to be improved. But the discussion always seems to end
there, with any new idea for reform immediately discarded by vote-sensitive
politicians and vested special interest groups.
Witness
the case of Maxime Bernier, who found himself under heavy criticism last month
when he suggested the feds do away with the Canada Health Transfer and instead
free up provincial tax room so that provinces could manage their own health
care systems as they see fit. Bernier was accused of trying to dismantle the
Canada Health Act and any further consideration of his proposal was effectively
halted.
This
week the Fraser Institute published a study with a policy recommendation that
we felt federal and provincial governments should consider because it would be
easier to introduce: a five-year population-wide moratorium of the Canada
Health Act, essentially taking a "time out" from the Act. This would
allow governments to try out any number of new policies that are currently
limited or even prohibited in Canada, but which are in place in the majority of
industrialized countries.
But
as has become all too common in the health care debate, the National Post was
soon reporting that federal Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq and Dr. Jeffrey
Turnbull, president of the Canadian Medical Association, had rejected the idea
out of hand . . .
According
to 2007 data from the Oganization of Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), Canada's health insurance system was the sixth most expensive among 28
OECD nations, but failed to match the majority of these nations in terms of
providing medical resources and services to the country's citizens. Canada fell
below the OECD average and ranked sub-par in 12 of 18 indicators used to
compare the availability of medical services and resources. Importantly, on 16
of the 18 indicators of medical output, Canada finished below its own sixth
place rank for health spending: meaning we tend to spend more and get less in
return.
But
what's most troubling is the fact that almost every country in the
industrialized world with a better performing health insurance system than
Canada, also has public policies in place that are either prohibited or limited
under the Canada Health Act. For instance, Canada is one of only four countries
that ban patient cost sharing for the use of publicly funded hospital care,
general practitioner care, and/or specialist care. Canada is also the only country
that effectively prohibits private health insurance for hospital and physician
services. Although private medical insurance is not banned specifically by the
Canada Health Act, federal and provincial governments have historically
interpreted the Act as intending to ban private insurance. While only six
provinces legally prohibit private medical insurance for medically necessary
services, all provinces have other policies in place that penalize providers
who choose to bill privately for services. In practice, private insurance is
generally only permitted to cover goods and services that are not covered by
our universal government-run health insurance plan, mainly dental services and
prescription drugs. . . .
Therefore,
in order to determine empirically whether Canada's health insurance system
would improve if policies similar to those in the rest of the world were
implemented, the federal government should temporarily suspend enforcement of
the Canada Health Act.
A
five-year moratorium would give provinces freedom and encourage experimentation
with alternative financing schemes. It would encourage innovation and just as
importantly, if some of the ideas did not lead to improved access to care,
provinces could always revert to the current system.
It's
obvious the status quo is not working, so why are governments afraid to try
policies that have been shown to work elsewhere?
Read
the entire report at the Frasier . . .
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
Canadian
Medicare does not give timely access to healthcare, it only gives access to a
waiting list.
--Canadian
Supreme Court Decision 2005 SCC 35, [2005] 1 S.C.R.
791
http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc35/2005scc35.html
* * * * *
4.
Medicare: When the Doctor Has a Boss
The traditional model of doctors hanging up their own
shingles is fading fast, as more go to work directly for hospitals that are
building themselves into consolidated health-care providers.
The latest
sign of the continued shift comes from a large Medical Group Management
Association survey, which found that the share of responding practices that
were hospital-owned last year hit 55%, up from 50% in 2008 and around 30% five
years earlier.
The biggest U.S. physician-recruiting firm, Merritt
Hawkins, a unit of AMN Healthcare Inc., said the share of its doctor searches
that were for positions with hospitals hit 51% for the 12 months ended in
March, up from 45% a year earlier and 19% five years ago. The number of
searches for physician groups and partnerships has dropped.
The trend is tied to the needs of both doctors and
hospitals, as well as to emerging changes in how insurers and government
programs pay for care. Many doctors have become frustrated with the duties
involved in practice ownership, including wrangling with insurers, dunning patients
for their out-of-pocket fees and acquiring new technology. Some young
physicians are choosing to avoid such issues altogether and seeking the
sometimes more regular hours of salaried positions. . . .
Hospitals are
also seeking to position themselves for new methods of payment, including an
emerging model known as accountable-care organizations that is encouraged by
the new federal health care law. These entities are supposed to save money and
improve quality by better integrating patients'care, with the health-care
provider sharing in the financial benefits of new efficiencies.
The consolidation wave is raising red flags among some
regulators, researchers and health insurers, who warn that bigger health
systems can use their leverage to push for higher rates. "We've always
been concerned about combinations that are being done to increase prices,"
said Karen Ignagni, chief executive of America's Health Insurance Plans. . .
Read the entire article (subscription required) . . .
Also read Mathews' companion article on Who's to
Blame . . .
Who's
To Blame For High Health Costs? Study Suggests One Answer
Feedback . . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
Government is not the solution to our problems, government is
the problem.
- Ronald Reagan
* * * * *
5. Medical Gluttony: Best Practices or Pay for
Performance is really Gluttony in Disguise
The best practices movement has gained a foothold with
politicians who are desperately trying to control costs under the illusions
that quality will reduce costs. However, they don't understand medical practice
well enough to measure quality. In general, what is understood as quality is
very expensive. Ordering tests under a protocol without medical judgment on
each individual patient will always be more expensive.
Doctors are well aware that cancer of the colon has
genetic factors, which cause it to have an increase in prevalence in some
families. Thus, we check for colon cancer much earlier if there is a family
history of colon cancer. We may check it 10 or even 15 years early if several
members had cancer of the colon in their 40s or early 50s. Others with no
family history of cancer of the colon, and a well-known understanding of their
familial medical history, have a very low incidence of cancer of the colon.
A recent Medical Grand Rounds at the University of
California, Davis Medical Center had a world authority presentation of colon
cancer. One of the take-home messages is that there are far too many
colonoscopies done than can be justified medically. The professor even stated
that if your patient was not disposed for colon screening, try to get a
screening colon check by the late 50s and then a second one by the late 60s
when the incidence of cancer of the colon is the highest. He felt very little
cancer would be missed in these patients, which many consider non-compliant
with the current HMO recommendations of annual stool checks or every two year
colon checks starting at age 50.
HMO doctors who don't comply will have a reduction in
their reimbursements. At the last HMO meeting, the CFO stated that if all
doctors would comply with best practices and P4P protocols, they could make an
extra $10,000 per quarter in bonuses.
Comparing costs of the doctors that order everything
the bureaucrats desire for quality in P4P is rather striking. In just this one
disease screening, the difference between two colonoscopies in the average
patient not at risk, at say $2500 each, is a lifetime cost of $5,000. For
someone having a colonoscopy at age 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80 and 85, the
lifetime cost would be $20,000 for no yield in quality. But the doctor that
does a gluttonous P4P will not only increase the health care cost of this
procedure by $15,000 per patient, he will also collect his additional $10,000
per quarter or $40,000 per year or $320,000 in P4P bonuses. Assume just 100
patients per year, that is an extra $1.5 million in health care costs per year
over his practice, plus his additional $320,000 bonus or $1.8 million in health
care costs. Compare this with the physician that practices high quality patient
centered care at $5,000 per patient. For the same 100 patients, the cost would
be $500,000 or one-half million sans bonuses.
How many physicians do you think will prostitute
themselves and their practices to get paid the P4P reimbursements?
How many ethical physicians will we have left after 10
years of government interference and practice manipulations?
When Hitler paid physicians their P4P (pay for
performance) bonus to determine which Jews had lives not worth living, very few
ethical physicians refused to participate. When will we reach the point of no
return?
Who among us will remain ethical with our heads raised
to the heavens?
Heaven help us!?
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
Medical Gluttony thrives in Government and Health Insurance Programs.
Gluttony Disappears with Appropriate Deductibles and Co-payments on
Every Service.
* * * * *
6. Medical Myths: Slow Metabolism makes me gain weight.
Boosting
Metabolism to Lose Weight: What Works, What Doesn't
By Adrienne Forman,
M.S., R.D. Environmental Nutrition, January 2006
Dieters often lament that a slow metabolism keeps them from losing
weight. Marketers of weight-loss products capitalize on this belief by offering
ways to boost metabolism and "melt away" unwanted pounds. Is a faster
metabolism really the key to weight loss? And can you really speed up your
metabolism?
Metabolism refers to the way the body uses energy (measured in
calories). The body uses calories in three ways: 1) To sustain vital body
functions like breathing, heart rate, waste removal, cells growth and repair.
Even at rest all this accounts for up to 75% of the calories you burn daily. 2)
For physical activity, and 3) for digestion and absorption of food which uses
about 10% of a day's calories.
The speed at which the body burns calories when at rest is called
your resting metabolic rate (RMR). . .
The only way to know your RMR is to have a health and fitness
professional measure it. . . It
measures oxygen consumption, which reflects the rate at which you body burns
calories. Cutting calories below your RMR is not smart, because your body then
shifts into starvation mode, lowering your metabolic rate even more. So even if
you are eating less, it can actually be harder to lose weight, because your
body is fighting to conserve the energy it has stored in body fat. . .
"The vast majority of weight loss is explained by how much
people cut calories and how much they exercise."
To
read the entire report, go to . . . .(subscription required)
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
Medical Myths originate when patients listen to rumors.
Myths disappear when patients do their research of scientific facts.
* * * * *
7.
Overheard in the
Medical Staff Lounge: When the Doctor Has a Boss
More
Physicians Are Going to Work for Hospitals Rather Than Hanging a Shingle
By Anna Wilde
Mathews, WSJ
The traditional model of doctors hanging up their own shingles is fading
fast, as more go to work directly for hospitals that are building themselves
into consolidated health-care providers. . . .
Adding to the incentive, some procedures are paid more richly if done in a
hospital than in a doctor-owned clinic. If doctors are employed by hospitals,
this extra money can be figured indirectly into their compensation. Under
anti-kickback laws, they still can't be rewarded directly for ordering services
such as imaging tests that are lucrative for the hospital but may not be
needed.
Dr. Rosen: What do you think of the Anna
Mathews' article about doctors going to work for the hospitals?
Dr. Milton: I think it's abhorent. Every
unbiased decision you make regarding a patient will be reviewed from a
financial aspect.
Dr.
Edwards: Despite some successful alliances, such as the Kaiser Permanente, I agree
with Milton they are all suspect and dangerous. Not only for physician and
patients but for insurance companies and healthcare costs.
Dr. Paul: How do you figure?
Dr. Edwards: The physician will never again
be totally free or objective in caring for patients. He will be practicing in a
glass cage and every action, prescription, or test will be reviewed. It is to
the hospital's benefit in regard to utilization and reimbursement and the
hammer and ax will be couched in terms of quality of care.
Dr. Paul: As long as QOC is the primary
end point, isn't that what we should all be working towards?
Dr. Edwards: But quality of care is
different at different times.
Dr. Rosen: It is also different at the same
time by different organizations.
Dr. Paul: You lost me Rosen.
Dr. Rosen: In the 1970s, the hospital's
favorite doctors were those that ordered numerous tests. The most favorite were
the ones who ordered daily electrolytes, daily chest x-rays, daily ECGs, daily
blood counts, etc., et. al., ad infinitum.
Dr. Paul: Maybe that's what the patient needed.
Dr. Rosen: But we all see our patients
every day or even oftener and if we need another set of laboratory tests, we
can order them daily. Otherwise there will be excessive costs. That's what the
hospital desires, insurance companies are neutral and patients at any financial
risk never know if the excessive costs are important.
Dr. Paul: But patient's really don't care
since they are not concerned about costs.
Dr. Rosen: That's precisely the point.
Patients with no significant copay except a fixed $25, $50 or $100 have no
financial concern after the first five minutes when that is used up. This opens
Pandora's Box where whatever the doctor orders, the patient shall have.
Dr. Paul: That's why patients obtain
insurance with little or no co-payment or deductibles. It saves them money.
Dr. Milton: Nobody seems to think of the
longterm costs as insurance companies have to increase their premium by double
digits because physicians and patients do excessive utilizations of unnecessary
tests and unnecessary treatments, all of which is seen as life saving by the
patient's family.
Dr. Rosen: I had a nine-year-old patient
some years ago who fractured his cervical spine and was on a ventilator. There
were a number of consultants on the case and money was no object. Until one
day, I was approached by the father for advice. He told me that he had a
million dollar cap on his health insurance and after three weeks his hospital
bill was approaching $600,000. At the present rate, he would no longer have
insurance on his boy in two more weeks if the $200,000-per-week continued. I
took it upon myself to go through the charge and change every six-hour order to
an every 24-hour order. I changed every daily order to an every-other-day
order. Several days later he thanked me for cutting the hospital bill in half.
Dr. Milton: So even a million dollar maximum
can save money in such cases.
Dr. Rosen: When Managed Care came into
vogue in the 1980's, they placed reviewers, primarily RNs, on every hospital
ward to police the actions of doctors in order to eliminate unnecessary
hospital stays and implement transfers. So doctors began ordering less tests
and less treatment.
Dr. Paul: You really believe that?
Dr. Rosen: I was personally approached
informally by another physician in my specialty saying, "Rosen, let me
give you some advice. We can no longer evaluate all of the patient's complaints
when they come into the hospitals. Just pick out the most important one,
evaluate and treat it, and get the patient out of the hospital as fast as you
can."
Dr. Paul: You're putting me on.
Dr. Rosen: The soft passive aggressive
tone of that doctor really scared me to death. My wife even noticed when I got
home.
Dr. Edwards: Hospital practice is couched in
the format of foundations. But make no mistake. That is just a legal
arrangment. The oversight is really the
same as if those in charge were the same directors.
Dr. Milton: I think Kaiser Permanente has
probably done the best job of keeping the physican practice totally separate
with the Non-Profit Kaiser Foundation and Kaiser Health Plan contracting with
the private Permanente Medical Group. It appears to be a rather solid marriage,
at least at this time.
Dr. Rosen: True. However, I've seen some
young physicians,who I thought were good, efficient and cost conscious, who did
not make it to partnership in two or three years. As near as the doctor could
tell, he didn't differentiate well enough between the average generic price and
the extremely low-cost generic price. When there are millions of prescriptions
for 25 five-cent antihistamines vs millions for five-cent antihistamines,
before long you are talking millions of dollars just between different
generics. They both look very cheap, but a million 100-tablet prescriptons of
one verses a million 100-tablet prescriptions of the other could mean the
difference between $25 M and $5 M, or $20 million cost savings. That makes a
doctor expendable and unacceptable for partnership.
Dr. Milton: As I said in the beginning of our
discussion, hospital practice, even when it's disguised as foundation practice,
is dangerous for our profession, for our patients, for the welfare of our
country and healthcare costs in general. Hospitals will do well because of
their clout. But eventually free enterprise will eliminate the high-cost
centers. As physicians, we best be ready for this.
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
The Staff Lounge Is Where Unfiltered Medical Opinions Are Heard.
* * * * *
8. Voices of Medicine: A Review of Articles from Doctors
A Homeless Man's Funeral . . . submitted by Dr. George Karr
As a bagpiper, I play many gigs. Recently I was asked by a funeral director to play at a graveside service for a homeless man. He had no family or friends, so the service was to be at a pauper's cemetery in the Missouri back country. As I was not familiar with the backwoods, I got lost and, being a typical man, I didn't stop for directions. I finally arrived an hour late and saw the funeral guy had evidently gone and the hearse was nowhere in sight. There were only the diggers and crew left and they were eating lunch. I felt badly and apologized to the men for being late. I went to the side of the grave and looked down and the vault lid was already in place. I didn't know what else to do, so I started to play.
The workers put down their lunches and began to gather around. I played out my heart and soul for this man with no family and friends. I played like I've never played before for this homeless man. And as I played ‘Amazing Grace' the workers began to weep. They wept. I wept, we all wept together. When I finished I packed up my bagpipes and started for my car. Though my head hung low, my heart was full.
As I opened the door to my car, I heard one of the workers say, "I never seen nothin' like that before and I've been putting in septic tanks for twenty years."
Apparently I'm still lost . . . –The Bagpiper
Feedback . . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday . . .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA . . .
VOM
Is an Insider's View of What Doctors are Thinking, Joking and Writing about.
* * * * *
9.
Book Review: The Master Switch by Tim Wu, Knopf, 366 pages,
$27.95
In the early
days of the radio industry, in the 1920s, almost anyone could become a
broadcaster. There were few barriers to entry, basically just some cheap
equipment to acquire. The bigger broadcasters soon realized that wealth
creation depended on restricting market entry and limiting competition. Before
long, regulation—especially the licensing of radio frequencies—transformed the
open radio landscape into a "closed" oligopoly, with few players
instead of many.
In "The
Master Switch," Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia University, argues that
the Internet also risks becoming a closed system unless certain steps are
taken. In his telling, information industries—including radio, television and
telecommunications—begin as relatively open sectors of the economy but get
co-opted by private interests, often abetted by the state. What starts as a
hobby or a cottage industry ends up as a monopoly or cartel.
In such an
environment, success often depends on snuffing out competitors before they
become formidable. In Greek mythology, Kronos—ruler of the universe—was warned
by an oracle that one of his children would dethrone him. Logically, he took
pre-emptive action: Each time his wife gave birth, he seized the new child and
ate it. Applied to corporate strategy, the "Kronos Effect" is the
attempt by a dominant company to devour its challengers in their infancy. . . .
In such an
environment, success often depends on snuffing out competitors before they
become formidable. In Greek mythology, Kronos—ruler of the universe—was warned
by an oracle that one of his children would dethrone him. Logically, he took
pre-emptive action: Each time his wife gave birth, he seized the new child and
ate it. Applied to corporate strategy, the "Kronos Effect" is the
attempt by a dominant company to devour its challengers in their infancy. . .
Mr. Wu notes
that, for most of the 20th century, AT&T operated the "most lucrative
monopoly in history." In the early 1980s, the U.S. government broke the
monopoly up, but its longevity was the result of government regulation. . .
In the past,
then, even arrangements aimed at maximizing competition have ended up
entrenching the dominant player. Some argue that the Internet will avoid this
fate because it is "inherently open." Mr. Wu isn't so sure. In fact,
he says, "with everything on one network, the potential power to control
is so much greater." He worries about major players dominating the
Internet, stifling innovation and free speech. . . .
Read
the entire Review . . .Subscription required
To read more book
reviews . . .
To read book reviews
topically . . .
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
The
Book Review Section Is an Insider's View of What Doctors are Reading about.
* * * * *
10. Hippocrates & His Kin: The Highest Pay Increases in
Sacramento went to Hospital CEOs.
The Cost of
Compliance
A survey by Ernst & Young in August and September of 380 executives
found that 31% are most concerned about the cost of compliance with the
[healthcare] law, while 16% were most concerned about their overall readiness
to comply.
If these
costs could be converted into health insurance, maybe we could get everyone
covered and not comply?
The Burden of Compliance
"There's an
administrative burden just to try and understand the 2400 pages of the
document" says Jenn Mann, Vice President of human resources at software
maker SAS Institute, Inc. As a result of the reform, SAS is doubling its legal
and consultant expenses for 2011, says Ms. Mann.
If
these costs could be converted into health insurance, maybe we could get
everyone covered and not comply?
Understanding Compliance
Borders Groups Inc. has increased health-care-related consulting by around 20% to
help it understand the law says Rosalind Thompson, senior vice president of
human resources.
If
these costs could be converted into health insurance, maybe we could get
everyone covered and not comply?
Many Capital CEOs got 2009 Pay Hikes, Sac
Bee, by Rick Daysog
The average compensation for the region's
top bosses – excluding those from privately held companies – was $542,144,
according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Internal
Revenue Service and the U.S. Labor Department.
During the same year, the median income
for households in the four-county Sacramento area fell 5.6 percent to $57,361,
the lowest level in at least a decade. . .
Some of the highest-paid people here include the heads
of health care companies and statewide industry trade groups, which operate as
nonprofits.
Sutter Health, one of the nation's largest health care
systems, paid 14 of its executives $1 million or more in total compensation in
2009, according to Sutter's tax filings with the IRS.
[Sutter] CEO Patrick Fry was the region's highest-paid
CEO with a compensation package valued at $3.99 million, a 41.3 percent
increase from the year-earlier period. . .
If
these costs could be converted into health insurance, maybe we could get
everyone covered and not comply?
Read more: www.sacbee.com/2011/01/09/3308311/many-capital-ceos-got-2009-pay.html
- ixzz1AZpIeIp3
It looks like In Health Care, is where the Money is.
To
read more HHK . . .
To read more HMC . . .
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
Hippocrates
and His Kin / Hippocrates Modern Colleagues
The Challenges of Yesteryear, Today & Tomorrow
* * * * *
11.
Professionals Restoring Accountability in Medical Practice, Government
and Society:
•
John and Alieta Eck, MDs, for their first-century solution to twenty-first
century needs. With 46 million people in this country uninsured, we need an
innovative solution apart from the place of employment and apart from the
government. To read the rest of the story, go to www.zhcenter.org and check
out their history, mission statement, newsletter, and a host of other
information. For their article, "Are you really insured?," go to www.healthplanusa.net/AE-AreYouReallyInsured.htm.
•
Medi-Share Medi-Share is based on the biblical principles of
caring for and sharing in one another's burdens (as outlined in Galatians 6:2).
And as such, adhering to biblical principles of health and lifestyle are
important requirements for membership in Medi-Share.
This is not insurance. Read more . . .
•
PATMOS EmergiClinic - where Robert Berry, MD, an emergency
physician and internist, practices. To read his story and the background for
naming his clinic PATMOS EmergiClinic - the island where John was exiled and an
acronym for "payment at time of service," go to www.patmosemergiclinic.com/ To
read more on Dr Berry, please click on the various topics at his website. To
review How
to Start a Third-Party Free Medical Practice . . .
•
PRIVATE
NEUROLOGY is a Third-Party-Free
Practice in Derby, NY with
Larry Huntoon, MD, PhD, FANN. (http://home.earthlink.net/~doctorlrhuntoon/)
Dr Huntoon does not allow any HMO or government interference in your medical
care. "Since I am not forced to use CPT codes and ICD-9 codes (coding
numbers required on claim forms) in our practice, I have been able to keep our
fee structure very simple." I have no interest in "playing
games" so as to "run up the bill." My goal is to provide
competent, compassionate, ethical care at a price that patients can afford. I
also believe in an honest day's pay for an honest day's work. Please Note that PAYMENT IS EXPECTED AT
THE TIME OF SERVICE. Private Neurology also guarantees that medical records in our office are kept
totally private and confidential - in accordance with the Oath of Hippocrates.
Since I am a non-covered entity under HIPAA, your medical records are safe from
the increased risk of disclosure under HIPAA law.
•
FIRM: Freedom and
Individual Rights in Medicine, Lin
Zinser, JD, Founder, www.westandfirm.org,
researches and studies the work of scholars and policy experts in the areas
of health care, law, philosophy, and economics to inform and to foster public
debate on the causes and potential solutions of rising costs of health care and
health insurance. Read Lin
Zinser's view on today's health care problem: In today's proposals for sweeping changes in the field of
medicine, the term "socialized medicine" is never used. Instead we
hear demands for "universal," "mandatory,"
"singlepayer," and/or "comprehensive" systems. These
demands aim to force one healthcare plan (sometimes with options) onto all
Americans; it is a plan under which all medical services are paid for, and thus
controlled, by government agencies. Sometimes, proponents call this
"nationalized financing" or "nationalized health
insurance." In a more honest day, it was called socialized medicine.
•
Michael J. Harris, MD - www.northernurology.com - an active member in the
American Urological Association, Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons, Societe' Internationale D'Urologie, has an active cash'n carry
practice in urology in Traverse City, Michigan. He has no contracts, no
Medicare, Medicaid, no HIPAA, just patient care. Dr Harris is nationally
recognized for his medical care system reform initiatives. To understand that
Medical Bureaucrats and Administrators are basically Medical Illiterates
telling the experts how to practice medicine, be sure to savor his article on
"Administrativectomy:
The Cure For Toxic Bureaucratosis."
•
Dr Vern Cherewatenko concerning success in restoring private-based
medical practice which has grown internationally through the SimpleCare model
network. Dr Vern calls his practice PIFATOS – Pay In Full At Time Of Service,
the "Cash-Based Revolution." The patient pays in full before leaving.
Because doctor charges are anywhere from 25–50 percent inflated due to
administrative costs caused by the health insurance industry, you'll be paying
drastically reduced rates for your medical expenses. In conjunction with a
regular catastrophic health insurance policy to cover extremely costly
procedures, PIFATOS can save the average healthy adult and/or family up to
$5000/year! To read the rest of the story, go to www.simplecare.com.
•
Dr David MacDonald started Liberty Health Group. To compare the
traditional health insurance model with the Liberty high-deductible model, go
to www.libertyhealthgroup.com/Liberty_Solutions.htm.
There is extensive data available for your study. Dr Dave is available to speak
to your group on a consultative basis.
•
David J
Gibson, MD, Consulting Partner of Illumination Medical, Inc. has made important contributions to the
free Medical MarketPlace in speeches and writings. His series of articles in Sacramento
Medicine can be found at www.ssvms.org. To read his "Lessons from the Past," go to www.ssvms.org/articles/0403gibson.asp. For additional articles, such as the cost of Single
Payer, go to www.healthplanusa.net/DGSinglePayer.htm; for Health Care Inflation, go to www.healthplanusa.net/DGHealthCareInflation.htm.
•
ReflectiveMedical Information Systems
(RMIS), delivering
information that empowers patients, is a new venture by Dr. Gibson, one of our
regular contributors, and his research group which will go far in making health
care costs transparent. This site
provides access to information related to medical costs as an informational and
educational service to users of the website. This site contains general
information regarding the historical, estimates, actual and Medicare range of
amounts paid to providers and billed by providers to treat the procedures
listed. These amounts were calculated based on actual claims paid. These
amounts are not estimates of costs that may be incurred in the future. Although
national or regional representations and estimates may be displayed, data from
certain areas may not be included. You may want to
follow this development at www.ReflectiveMedical.com.
During your visit you may wish to enroll your own data to attract patients to
your practice. This is truly innovative and has been needed for a long time.
Congratulations to Dr. Gibson and staff for being at the cutting edge of
healthcare reform with transparency.
•
Dr
Richard B Willner,
President, Center Peer Review Justice Inc, states: We are a group of
healthcare doctors -- physicians, podiatrists, dentists, osteopaths -- who have
experienced and/or witnessed the tragedy of the perversion of medical peer
review by malice and bad faith. We have seen the statutory immunity, which is
provided to our "peers" for the purposes of quality assurance and
credentialing, used as cover to allow those "peers" to ruin careers
and reputations to further their own, usually monetary agenda of destroying the
competition. We are dedicated to the exposure, conviction, and sanction of any
and all doctors, and affiliated hospitals, HMOs, medical boards, and other such
institutions, who would use peer review as a weapon to unfairly destroy other
professionals. Read the rest of the story, as well as a wealth of information,
at www.peerreview.org.
•
Semmelweis
Society International, Verner S. Waite MD, FACS, Founder; Henry Butler MD,
FACS, President; Ralph Bard MD, JD, Vice President; W. Hinnant MD, JD,
Secretary-Treasurer; is
named after Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, MD (1818-1865), an obstetrician
who has been hailed as the savior of mothers. He noted maternal mortality of
25-30 percent in the obstetrical clinic in Vienna. He also noted that the first
division of the clinic run by medical students had a death rate 2-3 times as
high as the second division run by midwives. He also noticed that medical
students came from the dissecting room to the maternity ward. He ordered the
students to wash their hands in a solution of chlorinated lime before each
examination. The maternal mortality dropped, and by 1848, no women died in
childbirth in his division. He lost his appointment the following year and was
unable to obtain a teaching appointment. Although ahead of his peers, he was
not accepted by them. When Dr Verner Waite received similar treatment from a
hospital, he organized the Semmelweis Society with his own funds using Dr
Semmelweis as a model: To read the article he wrote at my request for
Sacramento Medicine when I was editor in 1994, see www.delmeyer.net/HMCPeerRev.htm. To see Attorney Sharon Kime's response, as well as the
California Medical Board response, see www.delmeyer.net/HMCPeerRev.htm. Scroll down to read some
very interesting letters to the editor from the Medical Board of California,
from a member of the MBC, and from Deane Hillsman, MD.
To view some horror stories of atrocities against physicians and
how organized medicine still treats this problem, please go to www.semmelweissociety.net.
•
Dennis
Gabos, MD, President of
the Society for the Education of Physicians and Patients (SEPP), is
making efforts in Protecting, Preserving, and Promoting the Rights, Freedoms
and Responsibilities of Patients and Health Care Professionals. For more
information, go to www.sepp.net.
•
Robert J
Cihak, MD, former
president of the AAPS, and Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D, who wrote an
informative Medicine Men column at NewsMax, have now retired. Please log
on to review the archives.
He now has a new column with Richard Dolinar, MD, worth reading at www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/othervoices/story/835508.html.
•
The Association of
American Physicians & Surgeons (www.AAPSonline.org),
The Voice for Private Physicians since 1943, representing physicians in their
struggles against bureaucratic medicine, loss of medical privacy, and intrusion
by the government into the personal and confidential relationship between
patients and their physicians. Be sure to read News of the Day in
Perspective: In Commonwealth of Virginia v. Kathleen Sebelius, Judge Henry
E Hudson found that Congress cannot expand the Commerce Clause of the U.S.
Constitution to force people to buy a product. Don't miss the
"AAPS News," written by Jane Orient, MD, and archived on this
site which provides valuable information on a monthly basis. This month, be
sure to read: If there is a bomb under the foundations of your house, you do
not propose "tweaking" it. You want it disarmed, removed, and
dismantled. Browse the archives of their official organ, the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons,
with Larry Huntoon, MD, PhD, a neurologist in New York, as the Editor-in-Chief.
There are a number of important articles that can be accessed from the Table of Contents.
The AAPS California
Chapter is an unincorporated
association made up of members. The Goal of the AAPS California Chapter is to
carry on the activities of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
(AAPS) on a statewide basis. This is accomplished by having meetings and
providing communications that support the medical professional needs and
interests of independent physicians in private practice. To join the AAPS
California Chapter, all you need to do is join national AAPS and be a physician
licensed to practice in the State of California. There is no additional cost or
fee to be a member of the AAPS California State Chapter.
Go to California
Chapter Web Page . . .
Bottom
line: "We are the best deal Physicians can get from a statewide physician
based organization!"
PA-AAPS is the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Association of
American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a non-partisan professional
association of physicians in all types of practices and specialties across the
country. Since 1943, AAPS has been dedicated to the highest ethical standards
of the Oath of Hippocrates and to preserving the sanctity of the
patient-physician relationship and the practice of private medicine. We welcome
all physicians (M.D. and D.O.) as members. Podiatrists, dentists, chiropractors
and other medical professionals are welcome to join as professional associate
members. Staff members and the public are welcome as associate members. Medical
students are welcome to join free of charge.
Our motto, "omnia pro aegroto"
means "all for the patient."
* * * * *
"Confidence is going after Moby Dick in a rowboat
and taking the tartar sauce with you." - Zig Ziglar: Motivational author and speaker.
"Much of the stress that people feel doesn't come
from having too much to do. It comes from not finishing what they've
started." - David Allen: Management consultant, trainer, and author.
"The majority of individuals view their
surroundings with a minimal amount of observational effort. They are unaware of the rich
tapestry of details that surrounds them, such as the subtle movement of a
person's hand or foot that might betray his thoughts or intentions." - Joe Navarro: Former FBI agent and expert on nonverbal language.
"It doesn't matter where you are coming from. All
that matters is where you are going."
- Brian Tracy: Self-help author,
speaker, and lecturer.
FROM NIGHTINGALE.COM
Adolf Busch The Man Who Said No
to Hitler
Adolf Busch, the greatest German
violinist of the 20th century, is now known only to classical-record collectors
who treasure the searchingly eloquent 78s that he cut with Rudolf Serkin, his
son-in-law and recital partner, and the Busch Quartet, the ensemble that he led
for three decades. But there is another reason to remember him, one that in the
long run may well count for as much as the music that he made: Mr. Busch's name
is at the very top of the short list of German musicians who refused to kowtow
to Adolf Hitler. This latter aspect of his life is described in detail in Tully
Potter's "Adolf Busch: The Life of a Honest Musician" (Toccata
Press), the first full-length biography of the violinist ever to be published.
It is at once a stirring tale and a disturbing one.
Most of us, I
suspect, like to think of artists as a breed apart, a cadre of idealists whose
souls have been ennobled by long exposure to beauty. The truth, however, is
that they are every bit as human as the rest of us, and that a certain number of
them are self-centered opportunists who are perfectly willing to ignore evil so
long as the evildoers leave them in peace to do their work. That was pretty
much what many German musicians did when the Nazis came to power in 1933.
Within a matter of days, Hitler and his henchmen started putting into place a
policy of systematic persecution of German Jews. Numerous well-known Jewish
musicians, including Bruno Walter, Otto Klemperer and Emanuel Feuermann, either
were forced out of their posts or quit in protest.
In April,
mere weeks after Hitler seized the levers of power, the Busch Quartet decided
to stop playing in Germany. Mr. Busch also canceled his remaining recitals with
Mr. Serkin, issuing this statement: "Because of the impression made on me
by the actions of my Christian compatriots against German Jews…I find it
necessary to break off my concert tour in Germany." What makes this act so
significant is that Mr. Busch was the only well-known non-Jewish German
classical musician to emigrate from Germany solely as a matter of principle—and
one of a bare handful of non-Jewish European musicians, including Arturo
Toscanini and Pablo Casals, who resolved to stop performing there for the same
reason.
Virtually all
of the other big names in Austro-German music, including Wilhelm Furtwängler,
Walter Gieseking, Herbert von Karajan, Carl Orff and Richard Strauss, stayed
behind, some because they were active supporters of Hitler and others because
they thought that the Nazis would dry up and blow away. Mr. Busch knew better.
In a prophetic letter, he wrote, "Some of them believe that if they only
'play along,' the atrocities and injustice that are part and parcel of the
movement will be tempered, can be turned around…they do not notice that they
can only have a retarding effect, that the atrocities will still take place,
only perhaps a bit later."
Mr. Busch's principled stand was motivated in part by the
fact that many of his closest friends and colleagues were Jewish, including Mr.
Serkin and Karl Doktor, the violist of the Busch Quartet. But the Nazis, who
were keenly aware of the force of public opinion, were prepared to look the
other way at such things in order to prevent prominent non-Jewish Germans from
leaving the country in protest. As late as 1937, it was discreetly made known
to Mr. Busch that if he returned, the Nazi government would let Mr. Serkin come
back as well. "If you hang Hitler in the middle, with Goering on the left
and Goebbels on the right, I'll return to Germany," he replied. . . .
—Mr. Teachout, the Journal's drama critic, writes "Sightings"
every other Friday. He is the author of "Pops: A Life of Louis
Armstrong." Write to him at tteachout@wsj.com.
Read
the entire obituary . . . Subscription required . . .
On This Date in
History - December 28
On this date in 1869, William F. Semple of
Mount Vernon, Ohio, received a patent for chewing gum. We had gums of
various kinds before then, but Mr Semple's patent covered "The combination
of rubber with other articles" for "an acceptable chewing
gum." The virtue of chewing gum is
that it is still there when you finish - which is what suggests a rubber
additive.
On this date in 1917, H. L. Mencken
published an article in The New York Evening Mail describing the origin of the
Great American bathtub, how it was first installed in a mansion in Cincinnati
by one Adam Thompson in 1842, and how various states passed laws to regulate or
tax it. The article was a pure hoax; Mencken never intended it to be taken
seriously, but it was. To this day, you can probably find articles relaying as
fact the items of Mencken's imagination.
After Leonard and
Thelma Spinrad
Thank you for joining the
MedicalTuesday.Network and Have Your Friends Do the Same. If you receive this
as an invitation, please go to www.medicaltuesday.net/Newsletter.asp,
enter you email address and join the members who receive this newsletter. If
you are one of the 80,000 guests that surf our web sites, we thank you and
invite you to join the email network on a regular basis by subscribing at the
website above. To
subscribe to our companion publication concerning health plans and our pending
national challenges, please go to www.healthplanusa.net/newsletter.asp
and enter your email address. Then go to the archives to scan the last several
important HPUSA newsletters and current issues in healthcare.
Please note that sections 1-4, 6, 8-9 are
entirely attributable quotes and editorial comments are in brackets. Permission
to reprint portions has been requested and may be pending with the
understanding that the reader is referred back to the author's original site.
We respect copyright as exemplified by George
Helprin who is the author, most recently, of "Digital Barbarism,"
just published by HarperCollins. We hope our highlighting articles leads to
greater exposure of their work and brings more viewers to their page. Please
also note: Articles that appear in MedicalTuesday may not reflect the opinion
of the editorial staff.
ALSO NOTE: MedicalTuesday receives no
government, foundation, or private funds. The entire cost of the website URLs,
website posting, distribution, managing editor, email editor, and the research
and writing is solely paid for and donated by the Founding Editor, while
continuing his Pulmonary Practice, as a service to his patients, his
profession, and in the public interest for his country.
Spammator Note: MedicalTuesday uses many
standard medical terms considered forbidden by many spammators. We are not
always able to avoid appropriate medical terminology in the abbreviated edition
sent by e-newsletter. (The Web Edition is always complete.) As readers use new
spammators with an increasing rejection rate, we are not always able to
navigate around these palace guards. If you miss some editions of
MedicalTuesday, you may want to check your spammator settings and make appropriate
adjustments. To assure uninterrupted delivery, subscribe directly from the
website rather than personal communication:
www.medicaltuesday.net/newsletter.asp.
Also subscribe to our companion newsletter concerning current and future health
care plans: www.healthplanusa.net/newsletter.asp
Del Meyer
Del Meyer, MD, Editor & Founder
6945 Fair Oaks Blvd, Ste A-2, Carmichael, CA 95608
Feedback
. . .
Subscribe MedicalTuesday .
. .
Subscribe HealthPlanUSA .
. .
The Annual World Health
Care Congress
Advancing solutions for business and health care CEOs to
implement new models for health care affordability, coverage and quality.
In partnership with MedicalTuesday.net, the 7th
Annual World Health Care Congress was the most prestigious meeting
of chief and senior executives from all sectors of health care. The 2010 conference
convened 2,000 CEOs, senior executives and government officials from the
nation's largest employers, hospitals, health systems, health plans,
pharmaceutical and biotech companies, and leading government agencies. Please
watch this section for further reports in the future as well as www.HealthPlanUSA.net.
The 8th Annual
World Health Care Congress will be held April 4-6, 2011
Washington, DC
www.worldhealthcarecongress.com
Toll Free: 800-767-9499